Some families push back against journalists who mine social media for photos – they have every right to
Their appeal is immediately understandable – many people would be upset by seeing photos of a loved one everywhere after such a traumatic event.
- Their appeal is immediately understandable – many people would be upset by seeing photos of a loved one everywhere after such a traumatic event.
- There has been valuable commentary about the issues surrounding the common journalistic practice of mining social media after a “newsworthy” death.
- My PhD research offers further insight into a perspective that is rarely shared: the view of families bereaved through homicide.
Private photos in the public domain
- When these photos enter the public domain following homicide, they become photos of a victim.
- In this new domain, private photos serve altogether different purposes.
- My research indicates this is an issue that persists long into the aftermath of homicide, well after media and public interest has dissipated.
Judging victims
- My research uncovers how details in a photo can be highlighted and twisted at the expense of others.
- One mother recalled how her son would do a silly pose and ruin their family photos.
- Instead, the mother read comments made by the public underneath the article that said her son deserved to be murdered.
The right to control
- The bereaved deserve to be in control of that decision.
- Allowing them to make that choice themselves gives the bereaved agency at a time when they feel most powerless.
Laura Wajnryb McDonald does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.