Croydon

Yooma Wellness Announces Vitality CBD, Blossom and MYO Plant Nutrition Available on eBay

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, February 22, 2022

Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Feb. 22, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Yooma Wellness Inc. ("Yooma") (CSE: YOOM, AQSE: YOOM), a global vertically integrated wellness platform that develops and markets a portfolio of CBD and wellness brands, is pleased to announce eBay has added Vitality CBD, Blossom Skincare ("Blossom") and MYO Plant Nutrition ("MYO") to its CBD pilot programme, marking a significant step forward for the global wellness market.

Key Points: 
  • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, Feb. 22, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Yooma Wellness Inc. ("Yooma") (CSE: YOOM, AQSE: YOOM), a global vertically integrated wellness platform that develops and markets a portfolio of CBD and wellness brands, is pleased to announce eBay has added Vitality CBD, Blossom Skincare ("Blossom") and MYO Plant Nutrition ("MYO") to its CBD pilot programme, marking a significant step forward for the global wellness market.
  • Fifty-one Vitality CBD SKUs, five CBD oils from Blossom and four MYO CBD SKUs will be available for purchase.
  • We are delighted that Vitality CBD, Blossom and MYO have been invited to join its CBD pilot programme.
  • MYO Plant Nutrition is a UK-based plant nutrition business with a mission to help people improve their full-body wellness.

Jacobs Appointed to Transport for London's Professional Services Framework

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, August 12, 2020

DALLAS, Aug. 12, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- Jacobs (NYSE:J) has been appointed to Transport for London 's (TfL) renewed Professional Services Framework, on multiple lots, including Project, Program and Portfolio Management, Business Case Management and the new Lean Consultancy.

Key Points: 
  • DALLAS, Aug. 12, 2020 /PRNewswire/ -- Jacobs (NYSE:J) has been appointed to Transport for London 's (TfL) renewed Professional Services Framework, on multiple lots, including Project, Program and Portfolio Management, Business Case Management and the new Lean Consultancy.
  • TfL is the integrated transport authority responsible for the operation of the public transport network and main roads in London.
  • TfL estimates the framework will operate for a maximum four-year period, with contract mobilization immediately.
  • Jonathan Patrick, Chief Procurement Officer at Transport for London said: "Following a competitive OJEU procurement, we have now confirmed the successful bidders for our Project and Programme Management Consultancy Services framework.

Challenge Accepted: Exciting Escapes Introduces New Escape Room Experiences in Croydon

Retrieved on: 
Monday, January 13, 2020

The Mayor of Croydon cut the ribbon on 9thof January, Exciting Escapes Croydon is now officially open.

Key Points: 
  • The Mayor of Croydon cut the ribbon on 9thof January, Exciting Escapes Croydon is now officially open.
  • Peter and David Gale have already enjoyed great success since forming their business three years ago, over 60,000 people have taken part in escape room experiences in Southampton , Basingstoke and Portsmouth .
  • With the escape room phenomenon ever increasing in popularity, the future is looking bright for the two brothers and their enthusiastic team.
  • For further details, and to find out more about the different escape room experiences available, visit https://excitingescapes.co.uk/locations/croydon/

FER0810028

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, February 28, 2019

The complainant has requested information about a specific planning application. The Commissioner’s decision is that the London Borough of Croydon (“the London Borough”) has failed to provide her with the appropriate reasons and evidence to support its position. She therefore finds that the London Borough was not entitled to rely on Regulation 12(4)(b) of the EIR (Manifestly Unreasonable) to refuse this request. The Commissioner requires the London Borough to take the following steps to ensure compliance with the legislation: issue a fresh response which does not rely on Regulation 12(4)(b).

Key Points: 
  • The complainant has requested information about a specific planning application.
  • The Commissioners decision is that the London Borough of Croydon (the London Borough) has failed to provide her with the appropriate reasons and evidence to support its position.
  • She therefore finds that the London Borough was not entitled to rely on Regulation 12(4)(b) of the EIR (Manifestly Unreasonable) to refuse this request.
  • The Commissioner requires the London Borough to take the following steps to ensure compliance with the legislation: issue a fresh response which does not rely on Regulation 12(4)(b).

FER0790954

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, February 28, 2019

The complainant has requested information about a specific planning application. The Commissioner’s decision is that the London Borough of Croydon (“the London Borough”) has failed to provide her with the appropriate reasons and evidence to support its position. She therefore finds that the London Borough was not entitled to rely on Regulation 12(4)(b) of the EIR (Manifestly Unreasonable) to refuse this request. It also failed to carry out a Reconsideration (internal review) within 40 working days and thus breached Regulation 11(4). The Commissioner requires the London Borough to take the following steps to ensure compliance with the legislation: issue a fresh response which does not rely on Regulation 12(4)(b).

Key Points: 
  • The Commissioners decision is that the London Borough of Croydon (the London Borough) has failed to provide her with the appropriate reasons and evidence to support its position.
  • She therefore finds that the London Borough was not entitled to rely on Regulation 12(4)(b) of the EIR (Manifestly Unreasonable) to refuse this request.
  • It also failed to carry out a Reconsideration (internal review) within 40 working days and thus breached Regulation 11(4).
  • The Commissioner requires the London Borough to take the following steps to ensure compliance with the legislation: issue a fresh response which does not rely on Regulation 12(4)(b).

FER0768736

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, February 28, 2019

The complainant has requested information about a specific planning application. The Commissioner’s decision is that the London Borough of Croydon has failed to provide her with the appropriate reasons and evidence to support its position. She therefore finds that the London Borough was not entitled to rely on Regulation 12(4)(b) of the EIR (Manifestly Unreasonable) to refuse this request. It also failed to respond to the request within 20 working days and failed to carry out a Reconsideration (internal review) within 40 working days and thus breached Regulations 5(2) and 11(4) of the EIR respectively. The Commissioner requires the London Borough to take the following steps to ensure compliance with the legislation: issue a fresh response which does not rely on Regulation 12(4)(b).

Key Points: 
  • The complainant has requested information about a specific planning application.
  • The Commissioners decision is that the London Borough of Croydon has failed to provide her with the appropriate reasons and evidence to support its position.
  • She therefore finds that the London Borough was not entitled to rely on Regulation 12(4)(b) of the EIR (Manifestly Unreasonable) to refuse this request.
  • The Commissioner requires the London Borough to take the following steps to ensure compliance with the legislation: issue a fresh response which does not rely on Regulation 12(4)(b).

FER0751897

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, February 28, 2019

The complainant has requested information about a specific pre-planning application. The Commissioner’s decision is that the London Borough of Croydon (“the London Borough”) has failed to provide her with the appropriate reasons and evidence to support its position. She therefore finds that the London Borough was not entitled to rely on Regulation 12(4)(b) of the EIR (Manifestly Unreasonable) to refuse this request. She also finds that the London Borough failed to carry out a Reconsideration (internal review) within 40 working days and that it failed to issue a refusal notice stating all the exemptions on which it wished to rely within 20 working days and thus the London Borough breached Regulations 11(4) and 14 respectively. The Commissioner requires the London Borough to take the following steps to ensure compliance with the legislation: issue a fresh response which does not rely on Regulation 12(4)(b).

Key Points: 
  • The complainant has requested information about a specific pre-planning application.
  • The Commissioners decision is that the London Borough of Croydon (the London Borough) has failed to provide her with the appropriate reasons and evidence to support its position.
  • She therefore finds that the London Borough was not entitled to rely on Regulation 12(4)(b) of the EIR (Manifestly Unreasonable) to refuse this request.
  • The Commissioner requires the London Borough to take the following steps to ensure compliance with the legislation: issue a fresh response which does not rely on Regulation 12(4)(b).

FER0791619

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, February 27, 2019

The complainant has requested information about a specific planning application. The Commissioner’s decision is that the London Borough of Croydon has failed to provide her with the appropriate reasons and evidence to support its position. She therefore finds that the London Borough was not entitled to rely on Regulation 12(4)(b) of the EIR (Manifestly Unreasonable) to refuse this request. It also failed to carry out a Reconsideration (internal review) within 40 working days and thus breached Regulation 11(4) of the EIR. The Commissioner requires the London Borough to take the following steps to ensure compliance with the legislation: issue a fresh response which does not rely on Regulation 12(4)(b).

Key Points: 
  • The Commissioners decision is that the London Borough of Croydon has failed to provide her with the appropriate reasons and evidence to support its position.
  • She therefore finds that the London Borough was not entitled to rely on Regulation 12(4)(b) of the EIR (Manifestly Unreasonable) to refuse this request.
  • It also failed to carry out a Reconsideration (internal review) within 40 working days and thus breached Regulation 11(4) of the EIR.
  • The Commissioner requires the London Borough to take the following steps to ensure compliance with the legislation: issue a fresh response which does not rely on Regulation 12(4)(b).

BRIT School student gets Speaker audition

Retrieved on: 
Friday, November 30, 2018

BRIT School student performs for the Speaker of the House of Commons.

Key Points: 
  • BRIT School student Leon Benson began a lesson singing for his classmates and ended up performing for the Speaker of the House of Commons.
  • He said:
    Mr Bercow visited the BRIT School on the day after it was awarded the title Best Secondary School in Croydon at the Croydon Council Awards 2018.
  • The Speaker said he wished he had attended a dedicated facility like the BRIT School and he urged students never to be put off striving for a job that would give them great joy.
  • BRIT School Principal Stuart Worden said:
    Image: Student Leon Benson singing 'Tunnel Vision'.