How British imperial history shaped Charles III's coronation ceremony
Retrieved on:
Friday, May 5, 2023
This gave her authority even over those areas of India which were not formally subject to British rule.
Key Points:
- This gave her authority even over those areas of India which were not formally subject to British rule.
- To give this change of title a formal announcement in India, the British authorities staged what became the first of three durbars – ceremonial events held in the British Raj to formally proclaim the imperial title.
- The first coronation of a British monarch since 1953 comes at a time of reckoning for the monarchy, the royal family and the Commonwealth.
- George’s coronation in Westminster Abbey invested him with all his imperial titles, so what would be the impact of being “crowned” in India?
Coronation and the commonwealth
- The 1931 Statute of Westminster formalised the evolution of some former colonies into self-governing dominions within a British commonwealth.
- The coronation oath, a legal requirement dating back to the Coronation Oath Act of 1688, has been amended on various occasions, taking account of former colonies which have become republics.
Elements of empire
- Even the medieval roots of the coronation have elements of empire built into them.
- One item of the crown jewels is a stark reminder of empire – but it will notably be missing from the coronation ceremony.
- The controversy about the Koh-i-Noor will doubtless continue, but won’t intrude on this coronation ceremony.
A new-look guest list
- The biggest move away from imperial tradition has been in the compilation of the guest list.
- Charles III has departed from precedent by issuing invitations to monarchs from Europe and the Middle East, regardless of whether or not they had ties to the British empire.
- Some other heads of state are also attending, though the US will be represented by the first lady, Jill Biden, rather than the president.