Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health and Human Services

NCLA Petitions en Banc Sixth Circuit to Halt Government-Directed Social Media Censorship

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, October 31, 2023
Supreme court, HHS, Social media, Government, White House, Same-sex marriage in the Sixth Circuit, NCLA, Human services, Constitutional right, Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, Senger, Speech, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Complaint, First Amendment to the United States Constitution, United States courts of appeals, White, House, United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, En banc, Hearing, The central science, COVID-19, First, Changizi

asking an en banc U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, or the three-judge panel, to rehear the case and halt the government’s unconstitutional assault on free speech.

Key Points: 
  • asking an en banc U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, or the three-judge panel, to rehear the case and halt the government’s unconstitutional assault on free speech.
  • Biden Administration officials, including some within the Department of Health and Human Services, have violated the First Amendment by directing social media companies to censor viewpoints that conflict with the government’s Covid-19 messaging.
  • The en banc Sixth Circuit should correct the panel’s error and allow the Changizi plaintiffs to continue their lawsuit seeking to put a stop to the government’s extensive social media censorship activities.
  • We urge the Sixth Circuit, sitting en banc, or the panel itself, to rehear the case and correct this error.”

Victory! Federal Judge Rules Biden Administration Cannot Censor Americans on Social Media

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, July 5, 2023
Supreme, Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, White House, Coercion, Uncertainty, Speech, Human services, COVID-19, Constitutional right, History of the United States government, Joe Biden, DRS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Government, First, United States Department of State, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, District court, Supreme court, FBI, NCLA, Court, Federation, Crime, First Amendment to the United States Constitution, Counsel, John Davis (U.S. district court judge), Constitution, Social media, Computer security

Jill Hines was a dissenter from mandatory vaccines and lockdowns who also had her media posts throttled.

Key Points: 
  • Jill Hines was a dissenter from mandatory vaccines and lockdowns who also had her media posts throttled.
  • The agencies directed such companies to censor viewpoints that conflicted with federal government messaging on topics ranging from Covid-19 to elections.
  • They are prohibited from threatening, pressuring, or coercing social media companies to suppress or remove posted content featuring protected speech.
  • The Biden Administration’s outrageous assault on the Constitution and on the civil liberties of Americans must end.

NCLA Sixth Circuit Appeal Asks Court to Halt Government-Directed Social Media Censorship

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, November 29, 2022
Judgement, HHS, COVID-19, Same-sex marriage in the Sixth Circuit, District of Columbia Voting Rights Amendment, Social media, Policy, United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Government, The Administrative State, Coercion, Movement, First Amendment to the United States Constitution, Massachusetts v. United States Department of Health and Human Services, First, NCLA, Plaintiff, Presidency of Joe Biden

v. HHS, et al., which urges the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit to reverse the lower courts dismissal and allow the case to move forward.

Key Points: 
  • v. HHS, et al., which urges the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit to reverse the lower courts dismissal and allow the case to move forward.
  • Statements by President Biden, Press Secretary Jen Psaki, and other federal officials unequivocally prove they told social media companies what and whom to censor.
  • suithas shown that the government used state power to browbeat social media companies into censoring non-government-approved Covid-19 views.
  • NCLA released the following statements:
    The government may not direct social media platforms to censor expression of certain viewpoints about Covid-19 or anything else.