Animals Australia

Why Australia banning live sheep exports may be a net loss for animal welfare

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, July 6, 2023

Australia’s government wants to end live sheep exports.

Key Points: 
  • Australia’s government wants to end live sheep exports.
  • Chaired by the former head of the Murray Darling Basin Authority, Phillip Glyde, the panel is expected to report by the end of September.
  • The thornier question is whether the ban – something animal welfare activists have campaigned for decades – will be a net gain for global animal welfare.

Scandals, bans and reforms

    • In 2022 it accounted for about 4.7% of the global trade, mostly shipping cattle to Asia and sheep to the Middle East.
    • These markets either lack reliable refrigeration and cold-chain facilities for processed meat or have a cultural preference for freshly slaughtered meat adhering to specific practices, like halal.
    • Exports to Indonesia were suspended for six weeks in 2012, following an ABC Four Corners expose of cruelty to cattle in abattoirs.
    • These scandals, however, have led to significant reforms in the industry, with the federal government imposing stringent obligations on exporters for trade to resume.

Regulating treatment in importing nations

    • Two sets of Australian regulations oversee the treatment of animals being shipped for slaughter overseas.
    • Treatment in importing countries is covered by the Exporter Supply Chain Assurance System (ESCAS).
    • They require exporters to ensure all handlers and facilities (ports, transport vehicle, feedlots and abbatoirs) in importing countries to comply with both local and Australian welfare guidelines.

Imperfect but ‘unique and innovative’

    • A 2021 review of ESCAS by the federal Inspector-General of Live Animal Exports identified a number of regulatory gaps and ways to make the system more efficient.
    • In particular it noted that loss of control and traceability, sometimes with poor animal welfare outcomes, still occurs at low but chronic levels.

Reporting non-compliance

    • Anyone can make these reports, which are publicly available, along with the investigations arising.
    • For example, in 2021 the animal rights group Animals Australia reported non-compliant slaughter of sheep in Jordan.
    • The Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry agreed, and that the control arrangements of the exporter, Livestock Shipping Services, had failed.

Why Australia banning live animal exports may be a net loss for animal welfare

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, July 5, 2023

Australia’s government wants to end live animal exports.

Key Points: 
  • Australia’s government wants to end live animal exports.
  • Chaired by the former head of the Murray Darling Basin Authority, Phillip Glyde, the panel is expected to report by the end of September.
  • The thornier question is whether the ban – something animal welfare activists have campaigned for decades – will be a net gain for global animal welfare.

Scandals, bans and reforms

    • In 2022 it accounted for about 4.7% of the global trade, mostly shipping sheep to the Middle East and cattle to Asia.
    • These markets either lack reliable refrigeration and cold-chain facilities for processed meat or have a cultural preference for freshly slaughtered meat adhering to specific practices, like halal.
    • Exports to Indonesia were suspended for six weeks in 2012, following an ABC Four Corners expose of cruelty to cattle in abattoirs.
    • These scandals, however, have led to significant reforms in the industry, with the federal government imposing stringent obligations on exporters for trade to resume.

Regulating treatment in importing nations

    • Two sets of Australian regulations oversee the treatment of animals being shipped for slaughter overseas.
    • Treatment in importing countries is covered by the Exporter Supply Chain Assurance System (ESCAS).
    • They require exporters to ensure all handlers and facilities (ports, transport vehicle, feedlots and abbatoirs) in importing countries to comply with both local and Australian welfare guidelines.

Imperfect but ‘unique and innovative’

    • A 2021 review of ESCAS by the federal Inspector-General of Live Animal Exports identified a number of regulatory gaps and ways to make the system more efficient.
    • In particular it noted that loss of control and traceability, sometimes with poor animal welfare outcomes, still occurs at low but chronic levels.

Reporting non-compliance

    • Anyone can make these reports, which are publicly available, along with the investigations arising.
    • For example, in 2021 the animal rights group Animals Australia reported non-compliant slaughter of sheep in Jordan.

Seva.Love announces its first social impact project, The 3 Bears, to shed light on climate refugees in the animal world

Retrieved on: 
Friday, April 22, 2022

LAKE NONA, Fla., April 22, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- Seva.Love, co-founded by well-being icon, Deepak Chopra, MD, and social impact and tech entrepreneur, Poonacha Machaiah, come together with Seva.Love's NFT artist, WhIsBe, world-renowned wildlife photographer and filmmaker, Hamid Sardar, and non-profit animal protection organization, Animals Australia, to launch the "The 3 Bears" rescue mission to highlight the ongoing global climate crisis and raise public awareness to climate refugees in the animal kingdom. The Seva.Love 'The 3 Bears' NFT launch will be ready for minting on April 28th at 8AM PT at https://3bears.seva.love/.

Key Points: 
  • The Seva.Love 'The 3 Bears' NFT launch will be ready for minting on April 28th at 8AM PT at https://3bears.seva.love/ .
  • The plight of these bears illustrates the predicament of countless animals in the world who are becoming climate change refugees - species driven out of their habitats because of destructive human behavior.
  • The social impact campaign championed by Seva.Love to rescue the bears, is an outstanding example of love in actions for sentient beings."
  • Known for his iconic Vandal Gummy series, which emphasizes the juxtaposition of common narratives and stigmas society has adopted.

Annual Berggruen Prize For Philosophy & Culture Awarded To Public Philosopher Peter Singer

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, September 7, 2021

VENICE, ITALY, Sept. 7, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- Nicolas Berggruen, Chairman of the Berggruen Institute, today announced the selection of moral philosopher and public intellectual Peter Singer as the winner of the 2021 Berggruen Prize for Philosophy & Culture.

Key Points: 
  • VENICE, ITALY, Sept. 7, 2021 /PRNewswire/ -- Nicolas Berggruen, Chairman of the Berggruen Institute, today announced the selection of moral philosopher and public intellectual Peter Singer as the winner of the 2021 Berggruen Prize for Philosophy & Culture.
  • "Peter Singer has demonstrated the vital role of public philosophy in our world," said Nicolas Berggruen.
  • Singer will receive the Berggruen Prize for Philosophy & Culture in Spring 2022 in a ceremony to be held in Los Angeles.
  • Established by philanthropist Nicolas Berggruen in 2016, the Berggruen Prize for Philosophy & Culture was first awarded to Canadian philosopher Charles Taylor for his impact on the humanities, social sciences and public affairs in deepening understanding among different intellectual traditions and civilization.

We should all speak up for animals on World Farm Animals Day

Retrieved on: 
Friday, October 2, 2020

On World Farm Animals Day, the global charity World Animal Protection, is asking people to think about farm animals and to speak up and show they want better treatment for these animals who are smart and social.

Key Points: 
  • On World Farm Animals Day, the global charity World Animal Protection, is asking people to think about farm animals and to speak up and show they want better treatment for these animals who are smart and social.
  • Animal advocates have been pushing for years for more transparency and stronger protection for farm animals, but the opposite is happening.
  • Over the years, animal advocates, as well as the media, have shone light on animal cruelty incidents done to farm animals.
  • Last year, we gave more than 3 billion animals better lives through our campaigns that focus on animals in the wild, animals in disasters, animals in communities and animals in farming.