Referendum

POLL: Union's proposed homeless policy will deter 72% of Americans from booking LA hotel rooms

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, October 3, 2023

WASHINGTON, Oct. 3, 2023 /PRNewswire/ -- More than seven in ten Americans would be deterred from booking a hotel room in Los Angeles if hotels there are forced to house homeless people next to paying guests. That's according to a new national poll commissioned by the American Hotel & Lodging Association (AHLA) and conducted by Morning Consult.

Key Points: 
  • "If Unite Here succeeds in turning all LA hotels into homeless shelters, eventually there will be no hotels – and no hotel workers – left in the city."
  • If Unite Here's ballot initiative passes, LA would become the first city in American history to force hotels to house homeless people next to paying guests.
  • The AHLA poll highlights the dramatic deterrent a policy like this would be to tourism and hotel stays in the city.
  • Key findings include:
    72% of Americans said they would be deterred from booking a hotel room in Los Angeles if hotels there are forced to house homeless people next to paying guests.

Labor and Albanese recover in Newspoll as Dutton falls, but the Voice's slump continues

Retrieved on: 
Monday, September 25, 2023

A national Newspoll, conducted September 18–22 from a sample of 1,239, gave Labor a 54–46 lead, a one-point gain for Labor since the previous Newspoll, three weeks ago.

Key Points: 
  • A national Newspoll, conducted September 18–22 from a sample of 1,239, gave Labor a 54–46 lead, a one-point gain for Labor since the previous Newspoll, three weeks ago.
  • While Labor’s primary vote improved at the Coalition’s expense, the drop for the Greens should have cost Labor preferences.
  • He returns to net positive approval after falling into net negative for the first time this term in the previous Newspoll.
  • While Labor and Albanese improved and Dutton fell, the Voice’s slump continued, with “no” now ahead by 56–36, out from a 53–38 “no” lead in early September.

This Week in Policy & Public Interest News: 11 Stories You Need to See

Retrieved on: 
Friday, August 11, 2023

NEW YORK, Aug. 11, 2023 /PRNewswire/ -- With thousands of press releases published each week, it can be difficult to keep up with everything on PR Newswire. To help journalists covering the policy and public interest industries stay on top of the week's most newsworthy and popular releases, here's a roundup of stories from the week that shouldn't be missed.

Key Points: 
  • A roundup of the week's most newsworthy policy and public interest press releases from PR Newswire, including Kroger and Kellogg's initiative to fight food insecurity.
  • NEW YORK, Aug. 11, 2023 /PRNewswire/ -- With thousands of press releases published each week, it can be difficult to keep up with everything on PR Newswire.
  • To help journalists covering the policy and public interest industries stay on top of the week's most newsworthy and popular releases, here's a roundup of stories from the week that shouldn't be missed.
  • The list below includes the headline (with a link to the full text) and an excerpt from each story.

10 questions about the Voice to Parliament - answered by the experts

Retrieved on: 
Sunday, June 18, 2023

This type of information can manipulate people’s understanding of the issues, distort their vote and the result.

Key Points: 
  • This type of information can manipulate people’s understanding of the issues, distort their vote and the result.
  • Those looking for answers that avoid misinformation and disinformation often – with good reason – turn to experts.
  • Read more:
    We now know exactly what question the Voice referendum will ask Australians.

1. Do Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people support the Voice?

    • While there is not a single view among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, there is significant – indeed extraordinary – levels of support among them for the Voice.
    • First, Indigenous support is demonstrated by the deliberative processes that sits behind the Uluru Statement from the Heart.
    • This involved more than 1,200 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people from across the country (the claim that non-Indigenous people attended the dialogues is false).

2. Will the Voice insert race into the Constitution?

    • That section was originally included so as to give effect to the White Australia Policy, and Aboriginal people were excluded from it.
    • Its existence and breadth underscores the need for a mechanism – the Voice – to listen to the very people to whom those laws would apply.

3. How will the Voice make a practical difference?

    • The Voice will give Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people a constitutionally guaranteed right to speak to government and the parliament about what’s needed for practical improvements to people’s lives.
    • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have answers to many pressing issues confronting their communities, but all too often are not heard.

4. How can the Voice represent the diversity of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander views?

    • Claims that the Voice will be a “Canberra Voice”, unrepresentative of the diversity of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, and their views, misrepresents the proposal.
    • These principles indicate how the government intends the Voice to represent the diversity of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people, and their views.
    • These commitments will ensure the Voice is representative of the diversity of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander views.

5. Is the Voice in breach of international human rights standards?

    • In fact, the Voice is supported under international human rights law as it recognises Indigenous peoples’ rights to political representation and is consistent with the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
    • In human rights and international law, equality and anti-discrimination means more than just treating people exactly the same.

6. Don’t Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people already have lots of ‘voices’ to government and parliament?

    • There is currently no representative body to provide, in a nationally coordinated way, the government and parliament with the views and experience of the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people who will be affected by their decisions.
    • To the extent there are other Indigenous organisations working with government and parliament, the Voice will complement, not detract, from their work.
    • And while there may be more Aboriginal parliamentarians than ever – and this should be celebrated – these individuals do not primarily represent Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.

7. Will the Voice give rise to High Court litigation and clog up parliamentary work?

    • According to the prevailing weight of informed legal opinion, the establishment of the Voice does not pose any abnormal risk of excessive litigation.
    • Read more:
      What happens if the government goes against the advice of the Voice to Parliament?

8. How does the Voice affect sovereignty?

    • The Voice proposal interacts with sovereignty at three different levels.
    • First, the call for the Voice reform is based on the strong assertion in the Uluru Statement from the Heart of the continuing and unceded sovereignty of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples.
    • This is not what is happening under the Voice proposal.

9. Why do we need to put the Voice in the Constitution?

    • First Nations people, through the Uluru Statement from the Heart, indicated they wished for recognition in the form of the Voice.
    • The second part of the answer relates to the operation of the Voice.
    • If the Voice is in the Constitution, it can only be abolished by another referendum, rather than by a change of government policy.

10. Do Australians have enough detail to vote at the referendum?

    • There’s often a lot of confusion about this question, which is because there are two types of detail that people talk about.
    • This is the bit Australians are being asked to vote on, and the bit that is “permanent” (subject to a future referendum).
    • The second is the detail about what the legislation establishing the “nuts and bolts” of the Voice will look like.
    • Geoffrey Lindell has provided pro bono assistance to the UNSW Indigenous Law Centre on the Voice.

Dutton's 'no' vote reflects 40 years of Coalition partisanship on the Voice

Retrieved on: 
Saturday, April 15, 2023

Late last year, the National party declared it would oppose the proposed model, while the Liberal party did the same earlier this month.

Key Points: 
  • Late last year, the National party declared it would oppose the proposed model, while the Liberal party did the same earlier this month.
  • Indeed, the Coalition has a long-held opposition to an empowered Indigenous advisory body, and Dutton is parroting a well-rehearsed Coalition songbook.

The Coalition’s battle against ATSIC

    • Hand’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Commission (ATSIC) Bill would establish a national commission and regional councils across the country to monitor programs, develop policy and advise the minister.
    • In 1989, then MP John Howard declared the establishment of ATSIC an act of “sheer national idiocy”.
    • Shadow Minister for Aboriginal Affairs Christopher Miles declared his party’s intention to abolish ATSIC if it proceeded as Hand had envisaged.
    • When the ATSIC bill finally passed, it was stripped of the preamble, and self-determination had been removed from its wording.

What’s happened since ATSIC?

    • Latham suggested a reconstituted body, but Howard declared no intention of replacing it.
    • While there has been some cooperation on Indigenous policy since, bipartisanship around an advisory body has been a slippery proposition.
    • Disagreements emerged in 2017 when Labor backed the Referendum Council’s recommendation of a constitutionally enshrined Voice to parliament.
    • Everything they now argue to support their “no” vote to the Voice they have long maintained.

Ballotpedia's Top 15 Ballot Measures to Watch on Election Night

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, October 12, 2022

MIDDLETON, Wis., Oct. 12, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- Candidates aren't the only thing on the Nov. 8 ballot. Voters in 36 states will be deciding 129 ballot measures on issues ranging from abortion, marijuana, voting policies, firearms, sports betting, and state constitutional rights.

Key Points: 
  • While Ballotpedia's editorial and ballot measures teams are watching all ballot measures closely, they identified these top 15 based on their relation to wider policy debates, topic trends, campaign finance records, and unique situations.
  • Ballotpedia Managing Editor Ryan Byrnewho heads-up the organization's ballot measures teamsaid, "These 15 ballot measures relate to broader political debates, such as abortion, election administration, and firearms, and they can have a sizable influence on policy discussions nationwide."
  • "The trends we're seeing with these 15 measures, as well as state ballot measures in general," said Byrne, "are policies related to abortion, marijuana, and voting."
  • Register here for our "Top 15 Ballot Measures to Watch" webinar with Managing Editor for the Ballot Measures Team, Ryan Byrne, Ballot Measures staff writer, Victoria Antram, at 12:30PM CT on October 20, 2022.

MEDIA CONFERENCE ADVISORY: Khalistan Referendum for Secession of Punjab from India

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, September 6, 2022

He is the co-founder of the Initiative & Referendum Institute Europe and serves on the board of Democracy International, an organization that works to strengthen direct democracy opportunities around the world and Citizens in Charge Foundation.

Key Points: 
  • He is the co-founder of the Initiative & Referendum Institute Europe and serves on the board of Democracy International, an organization that works to strengthen direct democracy opportunities around the world and Citizens in Charge Foundation.
  • Author of several books, including Government by Referendum (2017), Referendums Around the World (Palgrave 2016), and Referendums and Ethnic Conflict (2014), and A Comparative Study of Referendums (2002).
  • Paul is a leading figure in initiative and referendum and is president of Citizens in Charge and Citizens in Charge Foundation.
  • To promote using of Referendum & Voting as means to resolve question of self-determination in line with the principle of freedom of speech and democracy.

Powerhouse Coalition Kicks-off Campaign to Pass California Ballot Measure to Increase Funding for Arts and Music Education

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, April 26, 2022

LOS ANGELES, April 26, 2022 /PRNewswire/ -- The Arts and Music in Public Schools Ballot Measure has collected more than 1 million signatures with the support of volunteers across the state, well in excess of the 623,200 valid signatures needed to qualify for the November 8, 2022 California ballot. This should ensure the statewide measure a spot on the November 2022 ballot. The powerhouse coalition behind the initiative held an event today to celebrate the progress and officially kick-off the campaign to get the measure passed. The event included performances by students of all ages from across California, Master of Ceremony Kevin Frazier along with special guests. 

Key Points: 
  • The powerhouse coalition behind the initiative held an event today to celebrate the progress and officially kick-off the campaign to get the measure passed.
  • The event included performances by students of all ages from across California, Master of Ceremony Kevin Frazier along with special guests.
  • "This will lead to the largest investment in arts and music education in our nation's history," he added.
  • This measure will accomplish the following:
    Provide on-going, annual funding for Arts and Music Education in public schools of almost $900 million, a more than 50% increase from current levels.

Sikh Group Sues the MacDonald-Laurier Institute and former CBC Journalist Terry Milewski over Khalistan Report

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, December 23, 2020

The defendants, The MacDonald-Laurier Institute (MLI) and Terry Milewski have published an untrue and misleading report regarding SFJs efforts in promoting Referendum 2020.

Key Points: 
  • The defendants, The MacDonald-Laurier Institute (MLI) and Terry Milewski have published an untrue and misleading report regarding SFJs efforts in promoting Referendum 2020.
  • Without any basis, they paint the referendum as a covert attempt to foment extremist ideologies.
  • The report is a malicious attempt to undermine the legitimacy of Referendum 2020 and to threaten SFJs viability as a not-for-profit organization.
  • These posters annoy me, Terry added, while addressing a webinar called Khalistani Terrorism & Canada organized by Indias right-wing think tank Law and Society Alliance.

Referendums Criteria

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, October 30, 2019

Latest Bill

Key Points: 
  • Latest Bill

    Latest news on the Referendums Criteria Bill [HL] 2019-20

    First reading took place on 29 January.

  • This stage is a formality that signals the start of the Bill's journey through the Lords.
  • Second reading - the general debate on all aspects of the Bill - is yet to be scheduled.
  • Summary of the Referendums Criteria Bill [HL] 2019-20

    A Bill to make provision concerning referendums within the United Kingdom on constitutional or parliamentary arrangements