Weight function

Investor heterogeneity and large-scale asset purchases

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, May 28, 2024

We quantify both the direct and the portfolio re-balancing impact,

Key Points: 
    • We quantify both the direct and the portfolio re-balancing impact,
      emphasizing the role of investor heterogeneity.
    • By purchasing large quantities of assets, the central banks aim to affect asset prices
      throughout the economy.
    • In this paper, we set out to deal with these challenges and to quantify both the direct
      and indirect effects of large-scale asset purchases.
    • In this paper, we set out to deal with these challenges and to quantify both the direct
      and indirect effects of large-scale asset purchases.
    • In the first part of the paper, we assess the importance of investor heterogeneity for
      the direct effects of central bank purchases.
    • Large-scale asset purchases are isomorphic to
      negative changes in supply, as they effectively reduce the supply of bonds available to private
      investors in the market.
    • We weigh the estimates by the portfolio composition (number of
      securities held) of the respective asset types for the average fund.
    • ECB Working Paper Series No 2938

      5

      price of one security depends on the slope of the demand curve for that asset.

    • However, in our setting, supply changes are not
      necessarily randomly allocated, as purchases could be correlated with asset characteristics.
    • To address this challenge, we isolate a random component of purchases and, with that,
      estimate the price elasticity of each type of investor.
    • For each investor type, we regress
      the security holdings on that security?s yield, instrumenting the yield with ECB purchases.
    • Given the estimated investor elasticities, we construct a security-level measure of the
      price elasticity of the investor base.
    • To address this concern, we exploit quasi-exogenous cross-sectional variation in
      investor base composition across securities, measuring the share held by each investor type
      prior to the announcement and implementation of asset purchases.
    • With this measure, we can finally test how investor composition affects the direct impact of
      central bank purchases.
    • In
      this part of the analysis, we focus on mutual funds, one investor type we estimated to be
      elastic.
    • This insight can help assess the calibration and targeting of asset purchase programs by central banks based on their objective
      function.
    • This paper relates to several strands of literature on unconventional monetary policy, intermediary and demand-system asset pricing.
    • First, we relate to the literature on large-scale asset purchases in the Euro Area, studying announcement effects of purchases (Andrade et al.
    • We contribute to
      this literature by estimating spillover effects on assets that are not eligible for central bank
      purchases while emphasizing the role of investor heterogeneity and developing a novel identification methodology.
    • Our contribution to this literature is to analyze the role of investors?
      preferences for the propagation of large scale asset purchases.
    • Then the aggregate demand curve for the asset is
      X
      k

      ?k x k =

      X

      ?k (?k ? p?k )

      k

      where ?k is the share of investor k in the market.

    • P
      By adding market clearing (S = k ?k xk ) we can derive that the price of the asset takes
      the following form:
      P
      ?k ?k
      S
      p = Pk
      ?P
      .
    • We denote with Dt = [dt,k , dt,k? , ...dt,K ] the N xK matrix of
      demand of each investor type for each security.
    • 4

      Direct effects and investor heterogeneity

      In this section we study the following research question: do effects of asset purchases depend
      on investor composition?

    • In order to answer this question, we test how purchases affect yields and how these effects
      vary as investor composition changes.
    • Third, we measure investor composition by exploiting
      quasi-random variation in ex-ante investor composition.
    • In the next section we will investigate how this
      security-level heterogeneity in investor composition matters for the effects of asset purchases.
    • 4.2

      Demand elasticities of investors

      In this section we investigate how different investor types react to Large Scale Asset Purchases
      (LSAPs).

    • In section 4 we estimated heterogeneity in elasticity across investor types based on how
      price-elastic they were to ECB purchases.
    • These results are in line with Table 3,
      where we estimate heterogeneity in elasticity across investor types.
    • To measure investor composition base heterogeneity we construct

      ECB Working Paper Series No 2938

      38

      security-level Weighted elasticity as we did in section 4.

    • Weighted Elasticity: Bn,t?1 =

      X

      ??n,k,t?1 ?k

      (8)

      k

      where ??n,k,t?1 is the share of the asset n held by investor k at t-1 and ?k are the elasticities
      of investor types estimated in section 4.

    • 7

      Conclusion

      In this paper, we examine the role of investor heterogeneity for both direct and indirect
      effects of central bank purchases.

    • Our findings show substantial heterogeneity in
      exposure to large-scale asset purchases across mutual funds.

EQS-News: BAUER Aktiengesellschaft: BAUER AG looks back on a challenging year in 2022

Retrieved on: 
Saturday, April 15, 2023

EUR -94.0 million (previous year: EUR 4.0 million)

Key Points: 
  • EUR -94.0 million (previous year: EUR 4.0 million)
    Schrobenhausen, Germany – At today's annual press conference, the BAUER Group looks back on a challenging year.
  • “We had to cope with some significant effects on earnings in 2022, which led to a significant loss," said Peter Hingott, Member of the Executive Board of BAUER AG.
  • In contrast, the total Group revenues of the BAUER Group rose by 13.7% to EUR 1,748.1 million, significantly above the previous year's figure of EUR 1,537.6 million.
  • Last Friday BAUER AG was informed by SD Thesaurus GmbH that SD Thesaurus GmbH and Doblinger Beteiligung GmbH have coordinated their conduct and thereby gained control over BAUER AG.

EQS-News: BAUER Aktiengesellschaft: BAUER AG: Preliminary business figures for 2022 are in line with the last issued forecast

Retrieved on: 
Saturday, March 11, 2023

Schrobenhausen, Germany – According to the preliminary business figures available as of today, BAUER AG has achieved the last issued forecast for the 2022 year.

Key Points: 
  • Schrobenhausen, Germany – According to the preliminary business figures available as of today, BAUER AG has achieved the last issued forecast for the 2022 year.
  • The BAUER Group last needed to adjust its forecast on December 6, 2022.
  • The Equipment segment in particular recorded a better operating result than expected in the fourth quarter of 2022.
  • The complete and audited business figures for 2022 as well as the forecast for the 2023 financial year will be published on April 5, 2023.

Rush Street Interactive Announces First Quarter 2022 Results and Raises Full Year 2022 Guidance

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, May 4, 2022

Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (NYSE: RSI) (RSI), a leading online casino and sports betting company in the United States, today announced financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2022.

Key Points: 
  • Rush Street Interactive, Inc. (NYSE: RSI) (RSI), a leading online casino and sports betting company in the United States, today announced financial results for the first quarter ended March 31, 2022.
  • Revenue was $134.9 million during the first quarter of 2022, an increase of 21%, compared to $111.8 million during the first quarter of 2021.
  • Net loss was $52.3 million during the first quarter of 2022, compared to a net loss of $0.1 million during the first quarter of 2021.
  • Adjusted advertising and promotions expense1 was $66.3 million during the first quarter of 2022, compared to $40.5 million during the first quarter of 2021.