America's leaders are older than they've ever been. Why didn't the founding fathers foresee this as a problem?
Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell experienced two extended “freeze episodes” during press conferences.
- Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell experienced two extended “freeze episodes” during press conferences.
- And several members of Congress mistook TikTok for the name of a breath mint (Tic Tac).
- His leading rival in the 2024 presidential race, former President Donald Trump, is not far behind at 77.
How did we get to this ‘senior moment’?
- Some of this may also be attributed to older Americans being far more likely to vote than their younger counterparts.
- Yet lifespans have increased around the world and the ageing of US politicians still stands out compared to other developed nations.
- Read more:
Yes, Joe Biden is old and has low approval ratings, but this is why he's still confident of re-election
What did the founding fathers think about term limits?
- The founding fathers fiercely debated term limits for both presidents and members of Congress and even included them for members of the Continental Congress in the first Articles of Confederation.
- As much as Americans cherish the idea of the nation being founded on a constitution and laws instead of traditions and monarchy, the founding fathers ultimately did not legislate any term limits.
- Instead, they largely assumed custom, tradition and democratic elections would dictate the terms of office.
- While US presidents have faced term limits for most of the past century, members of Congress continue to serve as long as they like.
The price of elected office and who can afford it
- The 2020 election was not only contentious, but it was also the most expensive in US history.
- It cost more than US$14.4 billion (A$22.5 billion) for the presidential and congressional races – more than double what was spent in the 2016 elections.
- The 2022 elections also broke a record for spending in a midterm election at US$8.9 billion (A$13.9 billion).
- On an individual level, the average winner of a House of Representatives race in 1990 spent around US$400,000.
- Those with the resources necessary to afford such expensive campaigns are more likely to be older than not.