Trump

1 good thing about the Iowa caucuses, and 3 that are really troubling

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, January 17, 2024

Every four years, the Iowa caucuses find new ways to become a problematic part of the presidential nomination process.

Key Points: 
  • Every four years, the Iowa caucuses find new ways to become a problematic part of the presidential nomination process.
  • Democrats have abandoned the Iowa-first tradition, at least for 2024, but Republicans went full speed ahead with the caucuses on Jan. 15, 2024.
  • Earlier this month, Republican candidate Nikki Haley dissed Iowa, telling a New Hampshire audience that their state primary that occurs after the Iowa caucuses would correct the mistakes made in Iowa.
  • “You know that you correct it.” That’s the sort of thing a candidate trying to do well in Iowa says after the caucuses – not before.

Iowa’s upside for long-shot candidates

  • Fans of the Iowa caucuses also note that lesser-known candidates can compete without having huge campaign war chests or political experience.
  • But how is being inexperienced in government or being unpopular with party donors considered a good things for selecting presidents?
  • Ramaswamy could only pull in 7% of Iowa caucus voters despite his boasts of visiting each of Iowa’s 99 counties, a feat officially known as a “full Grassley,” named for Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley.
  • They didn’t last all that long after Iowa.

Modern-day media realities

  • In the 2024 presidential campaign, Republican campaigns spent more than US$100 million on 2024 Iowa caucuses advertising, which amounts to about $600 for every Republican caucus participant.
  • In the 2020 presidential campaign, the total amount of ad spending was $44 million – and that included spending from Democratic and Republican candidates.
  • The media’s outsized role involves more than just receiving inflated campaign spending.
  • The fact that reporters focus on horse-race dynamics and downplay issues has long been a problem that diminishes interest and voter turnout, as media scholar S. Robert Lichter and I demonstrated in our 2010 book “The Nightly News Nightmare.” Those who defend Iowa and New Hampshire say they are more accessible to lesser-known and inexperienced candidates, but national polling and fundraising, as well as media coverage, are increasingly used as criteria determining who can effectively participate in these small-state processes and who can’t.

Long-standing flaws

  • The largest Republican caucus turnout was 180,000 voters in 2016, and the best year for Democratic turnout was 240,000 voters in 2008, when Barack Obama defeated Hillary Clinton.
  • If Iowa switched to a primary, which would allow a daylong window for voting, evidence demonstrates there would be a lot more participation.
  • With limited exceptions, Iowa caucuses require a voter to appear in person during the evening in the middle of winter.


Aside from the convenience factor, the major problem with the Iowa caucuses is that the state does not remotely look like America. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the vast majority – 88% – of Iowans are white. For the U.S. as a whole, that figure is about 75%. What that means is that caucus results may not be reflective of the nation as a whole but merely a snapshot of a certain small-town, folksy part of America.

Vote-counting delays

  • Despite decades of experience in running caucuses, Iowa has demonstrated that it frequently cannot count.
  • The New York Times described the 2020 Iowa caucuses as an “epic meltdown,” as results were not finalized for days.
  • One wants to ensure accuracy, and delays of days for election results are normal in closely fought contests.

A possible alternative?

  • Well, scholars suggest a range of alternatives, including a one-day, nationwide primary, a small-state-first system that groups states of similar population sizes, or perhaps a series of five or so multistate regional primary contests, with the order of the regional groups determined by lottery.
  • None of these alternatives seems likely to happen, though, and that means the various problems with the Iowa caucus process will continue, regardless of which party is conducting one.


Stephen J. Farnsworth does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Trump's Iowa win is just a small part of soaring right-wing populism in 2024

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, January 17, 2024

Democracy advocates cheered the defeat of the Law and Justice party in Poland and Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s breakthrough victory over his populist adversary in Brazil.

Key Points: 
  • Democracy advocates cheered the defeat of the Law and Justice party in Poland and Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva’s breakthrough victory over his populist adversary in Brazil.
  • Read more:
    Lula and the world: what to expect from the new Brazilian foreign policy

    But populists won big victories in 2023 too — and made comebacks.

  • Donald Trump, despite his numerous indictments and allegations he incited an insurrection on Jan. 6, 2021, began a second run for president.

A new age of extremism

  • Today, we have seemingly passed from the age of extremes into an age of extremism.
  • Low-trust voters feel they’ve been misled and reject the traditional policy options offered by social democratic parties.
  • With the decline in support for traditional left-wing parties in the Global North, voters are sending anti-establishment messages to the parties of the right.

Binary voting and wedge issues

  • Public opinion research from the Economist Intelligence Unit, Freedom House, the Pew Research Center and Sweden’s V-Dem Institute warn that there are fewer undecided voters than ever.
  • Modern politics is increasingly an exercise in what’s known as binary voting.
  • Amassing on land borders and crossing perilously by sea, migrants and refugees perfectly illustrate the “us versus them” mindset.

Asylum-seekers and the anxious voter

  • The answer is simple: in the skewed world view of nationalists, migrants are by definition “cheaters”.
  • Far-right populists campaign on the false belief that refugee-seekers are also corrupting the traditional way of life, taking jobs and driving up the cost of living.
  • Increasingly extreme populists have come to power promising to deal with the problem, but they’ve failed to provide any effective solutions.
  • It’s the same situation at the American southern border — in 2023, two million people illegally crossed the border.

A problem with no solution

  • Climate change, war and geopolitical rivalry drive already precarious populations to seek a place of greater safety.
  • But as the numbers rise, politicians continuously recycle bad ideas: close the border, send them back, send them elsewhere.
  • The main drivers of migration today are not just poverty and war in the Middle East and Ukraine, but also post-pandemic labour shortages.

Staring into the abyss?

  • In more than a dozen countries, populist leaders are poised to either take power or consolidate their hold on the opposition.
  • Wannabe fascists are set to play a bigger role in world affairs this year than they have at any time since the Second World War.


The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Entrepreneur and Veteran Glenn Wilson Announces Campaign for U.S. Senate in Michigan

Retrieved on: 
Tuesday, January 16, 2024

IONIA, Mich., Jan. 16, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Today, successful businessman, tech entrepreneur, Army veteran, and lifelong conservative Glenn Wilson (R-MI) officially announced his campaign for the open U.S. Senate seat in Michigan.

Key Points: 
  • IONIA, Mich., Jan. 16, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Today, successful businessman, tech entrepreneur, Army veteran, and lifelong conservative Glenn Wilson (R-MI) officially announced his campaign for the open U.S. Senate seat in Michigan.
  • A software developer by trade and the son of a Michigan farmer and disabled war veteran, Wilson is running to rescue the American Dream.
  • A Michigan native, Wilson spent his childhood in Detroit and Morley.
  • That type of ambition and business acumen are exactly what he plans on infusing into the U.S. Senate.

Trump’s arguments for immunity not as hopeless as some claim

Retrieved on: 
Monday, January 8, 2024

Former President Donald Trump’s claims of immunity from criminal prosecution will be argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Jan. 9, 2024 – on an interlocutory appeal from his trial for election interference.

Key Points: 
  • Former President Donald Trump’s claims of immunity from criminal prosecution will be argued before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on Jan. 9, 2024 – on an interlocutory appeal from his trial for election interference.
  • His arguments have been rejected by a district court judge, and the Supreme Court has declined to weigh in – for now.
  • Commentators have described his immunity arguments as “frivolous” and “absurd.” But such accounts underestimate the arguments’ weight and at times misconstrue them.

A related absolute immunity already exists

  • His first line of defense claims that his actions are covered by a constitutional immunity protecting presidents when they act in their official capacity.
  • They are saying he can’t be prosecuted for so-called “official acts.” A related immunity has been recognized in the past.
  • In 1982, the Supreme Court recognized that presidents have absolute immunity from civil lawsuits for their official actions.
  • Nevertheless, it is conceivable that courts would recognize presidential criminal immunity for official acts.

The complication from the impeachment clauses

  • But he went on to claim that since he was acquitted – only 57 senators voted to convict him, short of the 67 needed – he was not liable for criminal prosecution.
  • The New York Times called it an “even more audacious argument” than his claim of absolute immunity.
  • Indeed, impeachment proceedings are very rare, and most eligible offenders never face an impeachment.
  • Moreover, as the critics point out, criminal acts may be discovered after the person in question has already left office.

Does acquittal in an impeachment proceeding create or preserve criminal immunity?

  • That claim, if upheld, would provide Trump with criminal immunity whether presidents enjoy absolute immunity or not.
  • The claim would work only if Trump’s impeachment and his criminal prosecution were based on the same acts – an allegation that is disputed by the special counsel.
  • Here, Trump acknowledges that an impeachment conviction removes that protection – but insists that an acquittal does not.


Ofer Raban does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

How liberal conspiracy theories can be just as destructive as their extremist counterparts

Retrieved on: 
Monday, January 8, 2024

Liberal commentators frequently condemn conspiracy theories that threaten public safety.

Key Points: 
  • Liberal commentators frequently condemn conspiracy theories that threaten public safety.
  • But what if liberal conspiracy theories can be even more wrong-headed and damaging than their fringe counterparts?

Conspiracy theories, right and left

  • Liberal observers often present conspiracism as the preserve of right or left-wingers.
  • Journalist David Aaronovitch and philosopher Quassim Cassam, for example, attribute fallacious conspiracy theorising to the political “extremes”.
  • According to academic Grażyna Piechota, RT is guilty of “building a conspiracy message [and] using it as a political instrument”.

Combating Corbyn

  • But this didn’t stop exaggerated and indeed conspiratorial antisemitism allegations emerging from the British political centre in the mid-2010s to discredit then-Labour party leader Jeremy Corbyn and his supporters.
  • Sacks went further by likening Corbyn to the infamous racist politician Enoch Powell.
  • Corbyn himself repeatedly denied accusations of institutional antisemitism in the party but was suspended for claiming that such charges were “dramatically overstated for political reasons”.
  • Leaked documents from within Labour and an Al Jazeera investigative report found that antisemitism had been “weaponised” against Corbyn by his adversaries.

Trying to topple Trump

  • There were even claims about Trump cavorting with Russian prostitutes in a Moscow hotel room.
  • These liberal conspiracy theories about Trump and Corbyn are as simplistic and fallacious as much leftist and rightist conspiracism because they too often ignore wider economic and political contexts.

Deadly dangers of liberal conspiracism

  • Conspiracism from the centre can also have deadly consequences.
  • For instance, the 2003 invasion of Iraq, described by US intellectual Noam Chomsky as “the worst crime of the 21st century”, was justified by western governments’ false claim that Saddam Hussein could deploy deadly weapons within 45 minutes.


Stephen Harper is affiliated with the Socialist Party of Great Britain. Tom Sykes does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

An overlooked and undercounted group of Arab American and Muslim voters may have outsized impact on 2024 presidential election

Retrieved on: 
Monday, January 8, 2024

For some Arab Americans, a community that overwhelmingly voted Democratic in the 2020 presidential election, that support may have negative consequences on Biden’s attempt to regain the White House in 2024.

Key Points: 
  • For some Arab Americans, a community that overwhelmingly voted Democratic in the 2020 presidential election, that support may have negative consequences on Biden’s attempt to regain the White House in 2024.
  • In fact, numerous Middle Eastern and Muslim American leaders have called for their communities to “abandon Biden” in the upcoming presidential election.
  • As a whole, the number of Middle Eastern or Muslim Americans is quite small.
  • In the 2020 presidential election, for instance, Biden won the state of Michigan by a total of 154,000 votes.

Working around statistical erasure

  • As a social scientist, I specialize in statistical analysis and research on how race, ethnicity and religion affect political outcomes in the U.S.
  • I know from firsthand experience that any effort to gauge the attitudes and behaviors of Middle Eastern and Muslim Americans requires a bit of analytic gymnastics.
  • That stipulation is found in that agency’s Race and Ethnic Standards for Federal Statistics and Administrative Reporting and is used in U.S. census reports.
  • Even public opinion surveys that record religious denomination typically offer little to no insight into this community.
  • When it comes to more prevalent religious groups – Catholics, Protestants, white evangelicals – their opinions are frequently reported and the subject of many polls.
  • But Muslims are nearly always relegated to the “other non-Christian” religious category, along with similarly small faith communities.

Impact of defections on 2024 presidential campaign

  • Among Muslim Americans the drop is worse, from 70% in 2020 to about 10% at the end of 2023.
  • If these poll numbers hold true until Nov. 7, the 2024 presidential election would be the first time in nearly 30 years that the Democrats were not the party of choice for Arab American voters.
  • Though the order survived numerous legal challenges, it was eventually overturned by Biden shortly after he took office in January 2021.
  • Michigan is not the only state where no-shows in these communities could jeopardize Biden’s prospects for victory.
  • But even if they were, the numbers show that a presidential election may swing on a lesser-known but potentially crucial voting bloc.


Youssef Chouhoud does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

Eurasia Group publishes "Top Risks" predictions for 2024: "A year of grave concern"

Retrieved on: 
Monday, January 8, 2024

NEW YORK, Jan. 8, 2024 /PRNewswire-PRWeb/ -- Eurasia Group, the world's leading geopolitical risk advisory firm, launched today its much anticipated Top Risks 2024 report, offering a stark assessment of the year as a geopolitical minefield characterized by three dominant conflicts: Russia vs. Ukraine, Israel vs. Hamas, and the United States vs. itself.

Key Points: 
  • These are some of the key takeaways from Eurasia Group's Top Risks 2024 , the latest edition of the firm's flagship thought leadership report.
  • The report is co-written by Eurasia Group president and founder Ian Bremmer and chairman Cliff Kupchan.
  • The report explores in detail the domestic and global consequences of a victory by Donald Trump or Joe Biden.
  • GZERO Media, part of the Eurasia Group umbrella, will host a Top Risks livestream with Ian Bremmer, Cliff Kupchan and a panel of leading experts.

US Supreme Court decision on Trump-Colorado ballot case 'monumental' for democracy itself, not just 2024 presidential election

Retrieved on: 
Saturday, January 6, 2024

Momentous questions for the U.S. Supreme Court and momentous consequences for the country are likely now that the court has announced it will decide whether former president and current presidential candidate Donald Trump is eligible to appear on the Colorado ballot.

Key Points: 
  • Momentous questions for the U.S. Supreme Court and momentous consequences for the country are likely now that the court has announced it will decide whether former president and current presidential candidate Donald Trump is eligible to appear on the Colorado ballot.
  • The court’s decision to consider the issue comes in the wake of Colorado’s highest court ruling that Trump had engaged in insurrection and therefore was barred from appearing on the state’s GOP primary ballot by Section 3 of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
  • Maine’s secretary of state also barred Trump from the state’s primary ballot, and more than a dozen other states are also considering similar moves.
  • It’s the first time it has kept a presidential candidate off the ballot, much less a former one and the apparent frontrunner for the Republican Party nomination.
  • This was an extraordinary major decision from the Colorado Supreme Court.
  • I think the decision to grant only Trump’s case is a decision to make this as streamlined a process as possible.
  • Will whatever decision the court makes put to rest the ballot access questions in all the other states?
  • Those are months when the court is in recess, and they would have to come back from their summer vacation early.
  • They’ve scheduled oral argument on Feb. 8, 2024 so they want to move on as quickly as possible to put this to rest.
  • The two general points are that I think states have the power to judge the qualifications of presidential candidates and keep them off the ballot.
  • And states have done that over the years to say if you were born in Nicaragua, or you’re 27 years old, we’re going to keep you off the ballot.
  • You can look throughout history, going back to the 1890s, where ineligible candidates’ names have been printed and put on the ballot.
  • And we know that there’s Super Tuesday the first Tuesday of March when a significant number of states hold presidential primaries.


I filed an amicus brief on my own behalf in support of neither party in the Colorado Supreme Court.

Pundits: Central to democracy, or partisan spewers of opinion who destroy trust

Retrieved on: 
Thursday, January 4, 2024

Lippmann, a Pulitzer Prize winner, wrote a syndicated column on national and international affairs.

Key Points: 
  • Lippmann, a Pulitzer Prize winner, wrote a syndicated column on national and international affairs.
  • He advocated a philosophy in which honest reflection on common experiences would lift citizens out of their parochial worldviews.
  • A pundit is someone who offers commentary in the media on a particular subject area.
  • I want to suggest that pundits support democracy when their combat is driven by ideas rather than tribal identities.

Pundit proliferation

  • Mass media in the 1950s featured radio hosts who delighted in browbeating callers.
  • The rise of a television pundit class in the 1960s established a new type of celebrity, thanks largely to William F. Buckley’s “Firing Line,” which ran from 1966 to 1999.
  • Lippmann’s vision of the pundit as public intellectual sought to preserve “the traditions of civility” during the advent of broadcast media.
  • The aspiration was hardly a source of inspiration for “The McLaughlin Group” and other shout shows launched in the 1980s.

Incentives to punch up

  • Columnists cannot replicate the visceral experience of the shout shows, although the ability of readers to graze online heightens the incentive to punch up punditry.
  • The term “pundit,” though, is derived from the Sanskrit word “pandrita,” meaning “learned.” Many pundits are not trained in journalism.
  • As a scholar of political communication, I believe punditry is likely to become more specialized in catering to particular interests.
  • This trend works against Lippmann’s principle of commentary that offers reflection on common experiences.

Pundits and democracy

  • Commentary that oversimplifies policy disagreement erodes the trust that citizens have for each other, especially when opponents are belittled.
  • Pundits contribute to democratic backsliding when they cultivate dystopian views of politics.
  • The best example is the relentless negativity that characterized commentary on presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump in 2016.
  • The authors reported that “political differences of opinion do not, in and of themselves, harm attitudes toward politics and politicians.

Supporting democracy

  • Many political theorists insist that there is democratic value in heated commentary that calls out injustice.
  • Media scholar Patricia Rossini suggests that in evaluating political expression, people should be concerned not so much about tone as tolerance.
  • Audiences should also keep in mind the incentives of pundits, especially when commentators use their platforms to nurture relationships with politicians who undermine democracy.


Mike McDevitt does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

How religion and politics will mix in 2024 – three trends to track

Retrieved on: 
Wednesday, January 3, 2024

Religion is likely to play a big role in voters’ choices in the 2024 presidential election – much as it did in previous years.

Key Points: 
  • Religion is likely to play a big role in voters’ choices in the 2024 presidential election – much as it did in previous years.
  • Despite an overall shift away from participation in organized religion in the U.S. populace, religious rhetoric in the political arena has intensified.
  • In the 2016 race, evangelical voters contributed, in part, to Republican nominee Donald Trump’s victory.
  • Historical evidence can help identify trends that will likely influence the mix of religion and politics in the year ahead.

1. End-times rhetoric

  • End-times rhetoric has long played a prominent role in American politics.
  • Ever since Puritan John Winthrop first called America a “city on the hill” – meaning a shining example for the world to follow – the threat of losing that divinely appointed status has consistently been employed by presidential candidates.
  • John F. Kennedy employed that exact image of the “city on the hill” in a 1961 speech on the cusp of his inauguration, claiming that – with “God’s help” – valor, integrity, dedication and wisdom would define his administration.
  • By March 2023, at the annual gathering of the Conservative Political Action Conference, he predicted that “if they [Democrats] win, we no longer have a country.” Biden has likewise drawn on the image of final battles.
  • In a speech at Philadelphia’s Independence Hall on Sept. 1, 2022, he said that he and his supporters are in “a battle for the soul of this nation.”

2. Divine mandate

  • Since the establishment of the republic, many U.S. political leaders have claimed a divine mandate.
  • Scholars have long documented how those in power employ claims of divine authority to legitimize their role in a host of different countries.
  • Recently, some U.S. politicians and public commentators have shifted to claiming divine authority for anti-democratic actions.
  • Regardless of the outcome of the 2024 election, the switch from historical claims of divine authority for democracy to divine authority to challenge democracy is already obvious and apparent.

3. White supremacy and Christian nationalism

  • Likewise, the unapologetically white supremacist “alt-right movement” that coalesced in 2010 around the philosophies of biological racism and the belief in the superiority of white peoples around the world have likewise mixed overt white supremacy with religious doctrines.
  • This close connection between religious claims and white supremacy among overtly racist organizations has shown up in mainline political arenas as well.
  • Evangelical leaders have consistently failed to condemn or disassociate themselves from leaders with overt white supremacy connections.
  • In spring of 2023, 26 members of the House Oversight and Accountability Committee refused to sign a letter denouncing white supremacy.


Tobin Miller Shearer does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.